Search My Site
Categories
Best Economics Book Ever
Best Economic History Book Ever
How to Fix Health Care
My Introduction to Austrian Economics
Pushing Back Against Krugman
The Case for IBC
Pages
- “My History With IBC [Infinite Banking Concept]”
- *The Three Lads and the Lizard King*
- About
- Academic Work
- Books
- Check out the MURPHY-KRUGMAN DEBATE
- COMMON SENSE: The Case for an Independent Texas
- Contact Me
- Free Advice
- Lara-Murphy.com
- Popular Writings
- PRIVACY POLICY
- Reading List in Austrian Econ & Libertarianism
- Resumé/CV
- Videos
- Writings
My Trade Surpluses
Read at Your Own Risk
- Antiwar
- Big Questions (Steve Landsburg)
- Cafe Hayek (Boudreaux and Roberts)
- EconLog
- Ideas (David Friedman)
- Master Resource (Rob Bradley et al)
- Moneyness (JP Koning)
- MyGovCost Blog
- Satoshi Nakamoto Institute (Bitcoin)
- The Beacon
- Think Markets (Rizzo et al)
- Tom Woods
- Worthwhile Canadian Inititiative (Nick Rowe et al.)
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Bernie Jackson on Bernie Jackson on a Flaw with MMT Analogies
- random person on Receipts for BMS Ep 254: Kark Marx Was Kind of a Big Deal
- random person on Receipts for BMS Ep 254: Kark Marx Was Kind of a Big Deal
- random person on Receipts for BMS Ep 254: Kark Marx Was Kind of a Big Deal
- random person on Receipts for BMS Ep 254: Kark Marx Was Kind of a Big Deal
I really liked it! It’s great to learn the differences between similar schools of thought. And I thought the question that Tom posed about why there is the tendency of the different Austrian camps to group a certain subset of Mises’s teachings together was very interesting.
I’ve generally considered Keynesian economics to be primarily normative and Austrian to be positive. As such, that would suggest that Keynesians are more willing to tinker with the economy. An example would be Mankiw and his Pigouvian taxes.
Would you be able to address this in a future episode?