Search My Site
Categories
Best Economics Book Ever
Best Economic History Book Ever
How to Fix Health Care
My Introduction to Austrian Economics
Pushing Back Against Krugman
The Case for IBC
Pages
- “My History With IBC [Infinite Banking Concept]”
- *The Three Lads and the Lizard King*
- About
- Academic Work
- Books
- Check out the MURPHY-KRUGMAN DEBATE
- Contact Me
- Free Advice
- Lara-Murphy.com
- Popular Writings
- PRIVACY POLICY
- Reading List in Austrian Econ & Libertarianism
- Resumé/CV
- Sign up for the Lara-Murphy Report!
- Speaking Engagements
- Videos
- Writings
My Trade Surpluses
Read at Your Own Risk
- Antiwar
- Big Questions (Steve Landsburg)
- Cafe Hayek (Boudreaux and Roberts)
- EconLog
- Ideas (David Friedman)
- Master Resource (Rob Bradley et al)
- Moneyness (JP Koning)
- MyGovCost Blog
- Satoshi Nakamoto Institute (Bitcoin)
- The Beacon
- Think Markets (Rizzo et al)
- Tom Woods
- Worthwhile Canadian Inititiative (Nick Rowe et al.)
Recent Posts
- Bob Murphy Show ep. 193: Walter Block Explains His Entry into Libertarianism, and His View of the Future
- BMS ep. 192: Extending AnCap Analysis for Vaccine Passports, Court Rulings, and Desegregation
- BMS ep. 191: Clarifying the Economic Framework for Both Camps in the Bitcoin Debate
- Bob Murphy Show ep. 190: Benjamin Boyce on the Evergreen State Riots and Lessons for America
- Undercutting the Libertarian Case Against Lockdowns
Recent Comments
- random person on BMS ep 152: The Coming Darkness and Renaissance
- random person on BMS ep 152: The Coming Darkness and Renaissance
- guest on BMS ep 152: The Coming Darkness and Renaissance
- random person on Undercutting the Libertarian Case Against Lockdowns
- Harold on Undercutting the Libertarian Case Against Lockdowns
What was the context of your first comment? It reads like you were rebutting some point about juries.
It sounds like his point was that whoever was going to make the ruling, whether juries or judges or whoever, could know about the incident beforehand. I think he’s saying with the second tweet that those individuals are interchangeable for the purpose of his argument.
Bob is saying a talking duck is not capable of conducting a fair trial no matter who his friends are.
Go home, duck, you’re drunk.
I think that, in the twenty-first century, we really need to move beyond these primitive racial prejudices.
Here’s a riddle:
What did the Pope and the mallard duck say when they walked into a bar?
ouch!
Correct!
It must have been a gold bar
Just call me Lord Keynes.
LOL.
That’s all well and good, but what was the Pope’s testimony?
Twitter is a disaster even without Andy Kaufman. He might make it better, tweeting sentences from The Great Gatsby.