Warren Buffett Invests $5 Billion in Goldman Sachs
Warren Buffett apparently is a Free Advice reader. He has decided to invest $5 billion in Goldman Sachs, no doubt after reading my earlier blog post which contained the following analysis:
I heard a guy say on CNBC that it was crucial to save Goldman Sachs because it is a symbol of capitalism around the world. So that means no matter what, the Goldman shareholders know that they can’t possibly go bankrupt or even get bought out, especially by a foreign buyer. They are untouchable now.
SEC Adds to the (Long) Short List, But Allows Firms to Opt Out
The SEC added another 40 stocks to its “no short” list, but at least it is allowing firms to take themselves off the list:
Meanwhile, two companies JMP Group [JMP]…the parent of JMP Securities, and Diamond Hill Investments [DHIL]…have been removed from the list.
This is great. A libertarian writer (I want to say Boaz but not sure!) once discussed the idea of allowing vendors to sell things marked “UNREGULATED.” I.e. all of the government’s purity laws etc. would be the default, and only if a manufacturer clearly labeled something as unregulated, would those liability laws etc. not apply.
I am really curious to watch this play out. In the beginning it might just be a few purist firms who opt out–and our partner in exposing crime, Robert Wenzel, tells me that Diamond Hill did it for philosophical reasons as much as pragmatic ones. But if this trend picks up, then choosing to remain on the list will come more and more to be seen as an admission of weakness.
Democrats Let Offshore Drilling Ban Expire!!
This just came out Tuesday night: Congressional Democrats have decided to pick their battles, and will allow the congressional moratorium on offshore drilling to expire with the fiscal year at the end of September. (The Gang of 10 and then Speaker Pelosi’s bill, which passed the House last week, were all measures to reinstate a large portion of the expiring ban.)
Well this is very exciting but also nerve-wracking. In many articles I have been saying things like, “If the Democrats let the ban expire tomorrow, we would see a significant drop in oil prices.”
Now in truth, I can always cover myself (if I were a weasel) by saying that the markets expect them to reinstate the ban in a few months, and so there’s no real stimulus given to offshore production.
But I promise I won’t take that route out. If oil prices do not respond quite clearly to this surprise announcement, then I will admit I was wrong.
Wall Street Apologist Chadwick Latches on to Austrian Business Cycle Theory
At first I was really excited by this article linked from CNBC’s main page. The writer, founder of Ravengate Partners, early on sounds like Rothbard:
There is a long trail to the current financial crisis. Listening to our Government leaders blaming Wall Street greed for the entire debacle begs a response. The Government itself is an accessory before the fact to the state of affairs we find ourselves in today. Let’s review:
In the beginning – there were bad lending practices. And they are at the core of this extraordinary mess.
What was at the heart of the bad lending practices? The Federal Government!! Under both the Clinton and Bush administrations, it was government policy to encourage the private sector to ease underwriting standards in order to expand housing ownership in the U.S. The Federal Reserve under Alan Greenspan was an enabler in that development, by employing a monetary policy that kept interest rates exceedingly low, to the benefit of mortgage seekers. So lay blame on the US Government for bad policy.
But then she–and yes the founder of Ravengate Partners is a “she,” did you assume I was criticizing a man this whole time?–proceeds to blame everybody else outside her industry in very broad strokes. But when it comes to her industry, she concedes that “SOME (not all) Wall Street firms” (her caps) contributed to the current crisis.
In the grand scheme, I don’t think it even makes sense to ask what Patricia Chadwick thinks about Austrian Business Cycle Theory. But I guess it’s still a good sign that ABCT is now credible enough to make it into someone’s talking points.
UPDATE: When I first read the article above, I didn’t understand this line: “So lay blame on Wall Street for [w]recklessness.” (It is in bold and ends one of the paragraphs.)
I think I get it now: In her original submission, she had called for blaming Wall Street for “wrecklessness,” and then a CNBC editor contained the “w.” Does that strike anyone else as ironic? It has so many meanings…
Frederic Mishkin, Standup Comedian
A CNBC article had the headline: “Top Economist Mishkin: Worse Than the Depression” so I clicked on it. The piece contained two hilarious one-liners:
Economics scholar and former Federal Reserve Governor Frederic Mishkin says the shock that continues to rip through the nation’s economy is actually worse than what was felt during the Great Depression.
“The difference is, we have people on the ball,” the Columbia University professor told CNBC.
…
“We have Hank Paulson, who understands what Wall Street is all about, and in fact the dangers that are lurking there…” Mishkin said.
(Note that Mishkin probably didn’t intend for these quotes to generate mirth.)
Politicians, Not Ike, Causing the Return of Gas Lines
I explain in this IER piece. What tipped me over the edge on writing this up is that the absurdity struck us here in Nashville. It’s crazy; there are lines of 20 cars out into the street at busy parts of the day. The pastor at church even worked in gas shortage jokes into his sermon. An excerpt (from the article, not the sermon):
At artificially low prices, consumers want to buy more gallons of gasoline than producers want to sell. Specifically, what happened in this case is that wholesale prices spiked, eating away the profit margin of independent retailers. Because anti-price gouging laws forbade them from raising their own prices just as sharply, some retailers decided it was better to shut down, rather than lose money with every gallon they sell.
Bailing Into Commodities: How the Wall Street Bailout Raises Energy Prices
I explain in this IER blog post.
Diamond Hill Opts Out of SEC List of "Protected" Firms!!
If I am understanding this NASDAQ announcement correctly, it is the coolest thing I have heard in a while. Apparently
NASDAQ issuer Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) has voluntarily opted-out of NASDAQ’s list of Covered Securities under the SEC’s Emergency Order. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. will not be subject to the restrictions of the Emergency Order.
If this announcement is legit, I bet it won’t last. After all, the other relatively safe firms could take themselves off the list, so that the remaining ones look unsafe. This defeats the whole (ostensible) purpose of the SEC ban. So I think they are going to say DHIL isn’t allowed to invite short selling of its stock. If people can’t decide whether to use heroin, they obviously can’t be trusted to decide whether to take the SEC’s offer of a ban on short selling.
(HT2 Tim Swanson.)
Recent Comments