It sounds like his point was that whoever was going to make the ruling, whether juries or judges or whoever, could know about the incident beforehand. I think he’s saying with the second tweet that those individuals are interchangeable for the purpose of his argument.
What was the context of your first comment? It reads like you were rebutting some point about juries.
It sounds like his point was that whoever was going to make the ruling, whether juries or judges or whoever, could know about the incident beforehand. I think he’s saying with the second tweet that those individuals are interchangeable for the purpose of his argument.
Bob is saying a talking duck is not capable of conducting a fair trial no matter who his friends are.
Go home, duck, you’re drunk.
I think that, in the twenty-first century, we really need to move beyond these primitive racial prejudices.
Here’s a riddle:
What did the Pope and the mallard duck say when they walked into a bar?
ouch!
Correct!
It must have been a gold bar
Just call me Lord Keynes.
LOL.
That’s all well and good, but what was the Pope’s testimony?
Twitter is a disaster even without Andy Kaufman. He might make it better, tweeting sentences from The Great Gatsby.