Author Archive
A Falsifiable (Back) Test of the Krugman-Callahan Hypothesis
As if to help crystallize my attempts to get Daniel Kuehn to see why Krugman has been aggravating me on the issue of free-trade advocacy, Gene has a great post in which he suggests that it’s all due to the pay of Big Imports. Can we all agree that a good test would be my […]
Read moreTwo Incidental Observations on Krugman’s 1990s Trade Essays
I am going to have a bunch of trade stuff coming out shortly, but here on the personal blog let me note two things from my recent (re?)-reading of some of Krugman’s 1990s stuff. (1) In this essay on trade negotiations I’m pretty sure in these throw-away remarks he’s talking about the tax interaction effect, […]
Read moreRichard Tol Trolls Sir Nicholas Stern
The author of the controversial and famous “Stern Review” on climate change (in 2006) has recently come out with a piece in Nature arguing that economists need to change their models of climate change because “the consequences being assessed should include the damages to human well-being and loss of life beyond simply reduced economic output.” […]
Read moreSumner vs. Murphy, Round XIV
BTW Scott and I fight on the internet in the same way that young lion cubs spar. Anyway, in this post Scott pushes back, and I clarify in the comments. Note that I am standing up for a hypothetical Krugman, which my standard critics would be incapable of explaining. None of you understands my heart. […]
Read moreLudwig von Mises’ Contributions to Economic Science
A talk I gave at the International Students for Liberty Conference in DC a couple of months ago.
Read moreIntellectual Vertigo
If you like rollercoasters: (A) Read this, then skim this. (B) After that warmup, read this, then skim this. Be civil in the comments, kids. Maybe we can win them back.
Read moreContra Krugman Ep. 27 — Tom and I Talk Jobs & Trade
This one teaches some economics, just a heads up.
Read more
Recent Comments