Search My Site
Categories
Best Economics Book Ever
Best Economic History Book Ever
How to Fix Health Care
My Introduction to Austrian Economics
Pushing Back Against Krugman
The Case for IBC
Pages
- “My History With IBC [Infinite Banking Concept]”
- *The Three Lads and the Lizard King*
- About
- Academic Work
- Books
- Check out the MURPHY-KRUGMAN DEBATE
- COMMON SENSE: The Case for an Independent Texas
- Contact Me
- Free Advice
- Lara-Murphy.com
- Popular Writings
- PRIVACY POLICY
- Reading List in Austrian Econ & Libertarianism
- Resumé/CV
- Videos
- Writings
My Trade Surpluses
Read at Your Own Risk
- Antiwar
- Big Questions (Steve Landsburg)
- Cafe Hayek (Boudreaux and Roberts)
- EconLog
- Ideas (David Friedman)
- Master Resource (Rob Bradley et al)
- Moneyness (JP Koning)
- MyGovCost Blog
- Satoshi Nakamoto Institute (Bitcoin)
- The Beacon
- Think Markets (Rizzo et al)
- Tom Woods
- Worthwhile Canadian Inititiative (Nick Rowe et al.)
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Bernie Jackson on Bernie Jackson on a Flaw with MMT Analogies
- random person on Receipts for BMS Ep 254: Kark Marx Was Kind of a Big Deal
- random person on Receipts for BMS Ep 254: Kark Marx Was Kind of a Big Deal
- random person on Receipts for BMS Ep 254: Kark Marx Was Kind of a Big Deal
- random person on Receipts for BMS Ep 254: Kark Marx Was Kind of a Big Deal
Well at least they got one Nazi accusation in.. But aside from that it was remarkably neutral. I would guess this was largely thanks to Tom taking the wind out of her sails by telling her that he expects a hit piece coming from this. She couldn’t do that now anymore, could she?
“Episode 170 dissects a 2018 column in which Krugman argues that partisanship overrides even the most die-hard monetary hawk and that Republicans who objected to prime rate cuts by the Federal Reserve under President Obama were hypocritically changing their stripes under Trump. In response, Murphy rattles off Krugman’s reversals on debt and deficits over the years. In the George W. Bush years, he says, they mattered so much that Krugman changed his mortgage. In the Obama years, decidedly less so. Come Trump, deficits matter again. ‘So clearly,’ Murphy says, ‘he was a hypocrite there.’ (It’s worth noting that macroeconomic conditions have also varied significantly.) ”
Lol, “worth noting”
Macroeconomic conditions (by total coincidence) changed the moment Trump was elected.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=p0Lw
Purple line is when Obama was elected … Green line is when Trump was elected … Red line is slope of interest rates after the Fed began to hike.
Now I happen to believe the Fed did the right thing because rates needed to come up, and we could go one step further and suggest that a few small rate hikes back around 2014 and 2015 would have made sense. It does leave the observer perhaps a touch suspicious that they might have done the right thing for the wrong reasons. You could forgive Trump for feeling like it all lines up surprisingly neatly.
As for the debt, the debt-to-GDP ratio has been high, but flat (neither significantly increasing nor decreasing) for about the last 6 or 7 years. People should blame Obama (and Bush) for the debt, because that’s who contributed the most. Some might argue that Trump hasn’t fixed anything … fair enough, call me back when Krugman has finished fixing up the Japanese economy.
Good publicity for the cruise – sounds quite fun for nerdy types like myself, but probably not quite my theme.
It for sure is. Though I guess a real hard hitting Hit Piece might have been better publicity.