Archive for Nick Rowe
Potpourri
==> I make a modest point about fracking and federalism. ==> Simon Lester thinks Krugman is up to no good on his post about protectionism, but I don’t really have a dog in that fight. BTW, my Krugman takedowns are still coming, I’m just digging myself out of a pile of stuff. ==> Consumers are [...]
Read moreInterest Does NOT Equal the Marginal Product of Capital, Even in Equilibrium
Oh man, here I’m trying to really be productive. I have even come up with strict limits on my Facebook time. And then Nick Rowe goes and starts posting on capital & interest theory! Here’s the situation in a nutshell. In mainstream economics, it is commonplace for people to say that in a competitive equilibrium, [...]
Read morePotpourri
==> I want to call your attention to a major UPDATE I made to my response to DeLong/Krugman, inspired by Nick Rowe’s thoughts on macroeconomic disputes. ==> Justin Merrill makes some good points about Cantillon Effects. One thing I had meant to mention myself: The people objecting to the “simplistic” Austrian critiques love to say, [...]
Read moreLearning From Brad DeLong and Paul Krugman
[UPDATE below.] Rather than have a long series of posts discussing the fallout from my (price) inflation bet with David R. Henderson, I decided to do one comprehensive reply to Brad DeLong and Paul Krugman. I had toyed with not even responding, but two things ruled that out: (1) This isn’t a case of two [...]
Read moreRowe Ruh Roh
Sorry, I was trying to come up with the analog of a Krugman Kontradiction for Nick Rowe, and this was it… Some of you may recall that I happily linked to Nick Rowe explaining just how nutty was Paul Krugman’s praise of a hypothetical bond vigilante attack on the US. (Remember, Brad DeLong had to [...]
Read morePotpourri
==> After reading my scathing critique, David Frum will wish he had added another axis of evil. ==> My interview on MMT matters. I am tough, but I am fair. (?) ==> Jerry O’Driscoll catches something that I noticed too: The Fed’s announcement seems to turn a ceiling into a floor. (HT2 the eagle-eyed von [...]
Read moreOne More on Cantillon for 2012
[UPDATE below.] Last post this year from me on Cantillon, with the usual disclaimer that if Paul Krugman jumps in, all options are back on the table… In another comment Bill Woolsey says: In my view, Richmond’s short quotation and your short quotation about Wall Street restaurants were very much wrong and focus on from [...]
Read moreClarification on Cantillon Effects
Steve Horwitz’s thoughts reinforced my own inkling that I should spell out what I had always filed away as “the Austrian point about Cantillon effects.” So the following is what I would have said, had you asked me a month ago. Note that I speak for myself, and I’m not even saying this is what [...]
Read more
Recent Comments