I am working on a post that gets into the specifics, but my first reaction to Henry Paulson et al.’s recent evangelism on climate change policy. An excerpt:
In a sense, Henry Paulson actually is a great guy to be spearheading the movement to get the federal government heavily involved in the energy sector. He has a history of obfuscation and mafia tactics with which he showers his cronies with government-backed privileges.
My dad had back-to-back gigs while I visit for the holiday, so I made a medley.
My latest LibertyChat article. The stirring conclusion:
So as I reflect this Fourth of July on the men we are taught to revere as our “Founding Fathers,” I celebrate not the willingness to kill for liberty, but instead the willingness to do what is right, regardless of the effects on popularity or even personal safety. On this score, few people in human history have performed better than the radical Thomas Paine.
From July 20 – 26 I will be in Auburn AL at the original Mises Institute for the famous “Mises University.” This is the flagship event for the Mises Institute in which we provide a comprehensive introduction to Austro-libertarian thought. I realize a week in Alabama in July doesn’t sound appetizing, but it is truly a life-changing experience, particularly for undergrad students (the primary target audience). Here’s a short video explaining it. I imagine they are all booked at this point, but here is a link to enroll for the live video feed.
For those closer to Toronto, there is another option starting this year. Mises Canada is hosting a 3-day “Rothbard University” from July 16-19. (If you buy tickets here, use promo code “Murphy”.) Separately you can buy tickets to dinner with Walter Block.
(Just to be clear, I’m not teaching at the Mises Canada event this year, but they asked me to help get the word out since it’s a new event.)
I’ll be at FreedomFest next week with Mises Canada, if any of you are going to Vegas, baby…
For a while now I have been warning people that even a slight rise in interest rates could render the Fed technically insolvent, because the market value of its assets would be lower than its outstanding liabilities. In terms of accounting, therefore, it would have negative shareholder equity.
Now in early 2011, there was a rule-change that would possibly rescue the Fed from officially declaring bankruptcy: In the event of a big capital loss emanating from a crash in the bond market, the Fed could conceivably argue that it owed the Treasury a negative amount of money. I walk through all of this hocus pocus here.
Yet this had all been theoretical. I was just made aware that back in December 2013, the Fed in practice came very close to actual insolvency (if it marked its assets to market). Specifically, as of 12/31/2013, the Fed reported equity capital of $55.0bn and unrealized portfolio losses of $53.3bn, meaning there was a net (mark-to-market) equity of $1.7bn supporting $4 trillion of assets. (I have seen an official auditor’s report with these figures, but I can’t find an online source to link you to.) That’s pretty leveraged.
If you want to think through what it “means” if the Fed literally goes bankrupt, read my earlier article. By no means will the government say, “Aww shucks, I guess we’ll get out of the fiat money business.” But it might spook investors and pop what I believe is our massive bubble in dollars and Treasury debt.
Here’s my response to Noah Smith. An excerpt:
So note the contradiction: On the one hand, mainstream economists ridicule Misesians for their “medieval” approach to economic theory, in which they deduce results logically rather than producing falsifiable propositions. But then these same critics tell the world that the outcome of a CPI movement destroys the foundations of Austrian theory. Huh?
Really, that was his recent argument. Details here.
…I need you guys to explain something to me. The Order of the Phoenix debated whether I should respond to Noah Smith’s balanced and judicious essay on Austrian economics, and the ayes have it.
But before I write it up, I am genuinely confused on one point: Noah refers to the Austrians’ “antiSemitic overtones” and links to a this YouTube video, which has been out since 2013 and has “301+ views.” I can’t even figure out who released the video, let alone verify that it is someone associated with Austrian economics.
Am I missing something?